Donate Now

Extraordinary Links

The Overlooked Consequences of Reforms: The Impact of Changes to PIP, Universal Credit, and ESA on Disabled Children and Their Families

The UK government’s proposed extensive reforms to Personal Independence Payment (PIP), Universal Credit (UC), and Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) seek to control expenses and encourage employment. However, for millions of disabled individuals and their families relying on these essential supports, the effects could be catastrophic, especially for children in already overburdened households.

The Numbers at a Glance

  • Over 3 million disabled people are expected to be affected by the reforms.
  • 800,000 people could lose access to PIP by 2030.
  • 870,000 children live in households receiving PIP—290,000 of them are already in poverty.
  • UC’s health element will decrease from £97 to £50 per week for new claimants starting in 2026, with the amount frozen until 2030.
  • ESA is being completely phased out by 2026.

These figures speak volumes, but the true cost is human.

Impact on Disabled Children and Their Families

1. Delayed Support for Young People

The transition from Disability Living Allowance (DLA) to PIP currently occurs at 16, but a proposed change would postpone this to 18. While this might seem like a reprieve, it could hinder access to benefits that depend on PIP eligibility.

2. Financial Fallout

Reducing or freezing benefit rates during a cost-of-living crisis doesn’t just stretch budgets; it breaks them. For households already managing additional costs related to disability, cuts could lead to an average loss of £1,400 per year.

3. Threats to Employment and Independence

Many disabled people who work rely on PIP to fund vital assistance, like mobility aids, transport, or personal support workers. These cuts risk forcing them to reduce hours or leave work altogether, ironically undermining the very “back to work” outcomes the policies claim to support.

What Can We Do?

1. Petition Parliament

Under UK law, any petition that garners over 100,000 signatures must be considered for parliamentary debate. Several petitions opposing these reforms live on platforms like Parliament Petitions and Change.org. Signing and sharing these can build critical momentum.

2. Contact Your MP

Writing to your local MP may feel like shouting into the wind, but it’s surprisingly effective. MPs track the issues their constituents care about—especially when public sentiment is loud and clear. Template letters are available via advocacy groups like Scope, Disability Rights UK, and CPAG. For those of us in Bristol, the following are the MP contact information

Bristol’s Parliamentary Constituencies

  1. Bristol Central
  2. Bristol East
  3. Bristol North East
    • MP: Damien Egan (Labour)
    • Email: damien.egan.mp@parliament.uk
  4. Bristol North West
  5. Bristol South

3. Join Campaigns and Protests

Groups, including Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) and Inclusion London, have been vocal and visible in their opposition. Engaging in protests, forums, and public consultations makes the conversation impossible to ignore.

4. Social Media Amplification

Hashtags such as #SaveOurSupport, #PIPreform, and #StopTheCuts are being used to raise awareness. Tagging MPs and official accounts increases visibility and puts pressure on policymakers.

What Are the Experts Saying? 

  • Carers UK warns that over 150,000 carers could lose their entitlement to Carer’s Allowance. 
  • The Child Poverty Action Group argues these changes directly counter any ambition to reduce child poverty. 
  • The Equality and Human Rights Commission has raised legal and ethical questions about whether the reforms breach the UK’s obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

The Cost of Cutting Corners

Indeed, welfare expenditures are substantial, yet the price of overlooking the experiences of disabled individuals is equally significant. While the government discusses empowerment and work incentives, these initiatives might distance families from both goals.

However, reform is not solely a one-way path. There remains an opportunity to effect change through coordinated advocacy, strong public opposition, and community solidarity. Public pressure has previously influenced policy, and with sufficient backing, it can achieve the same result once more.